Tags

, , , , ,

Twice lately I’ve encountered the disturbing implication that, because an incident wasn’t searchable on the internet or hadn’t been documented in a photograph, the incident had never occurred. One incident involves a rumor that I don’t wish to feed, while the other incident was a murder: the person searching for facts was understandably distressed that the crime had received little attention. What concerns me is the perception that reality can be determined by a Google search: if there are no results, it just didn’t happen?

It seems absurd to infer that something didn’t happen simply because someone failed to document it. True, artifacts and written records give us valuable clues about the past; we would know little about ancient civilizations without physical remnants or recorded memories. Indeed, the desire to preserve memories through paintings or portraits is inherently human. But, given the extent to which photo-taking has infiltrated the twenty-first century, we may have gone too far in our desire to document our lives.

sandi and tom in poolCameras are everywhere, and I do mean, everywhere: on music players, computers, video game systems, and, of course, on our mobile phones. When I leave the house, I need to have my phone with me as much because it contains a camera as because I might get a text or call. What if I see something intriguing or lovely while I’m out? What if my son does something quirky or cute? What if I see a garment at Target that my daughter might like? When I was a child, cameras came out on occasions like holidays or Halloween, birthdays or gatherings. Developing film was expensive, and putting those photos into scrapbooks was time-consuming. My mother took some photos of us in the sandbox or on the swing set, but many pictures feature us wearing Easter clothes, looking into Christmas stockings, going to the zoo, or blowing out candles.

IMG_1960

Fresh scones made by my daughter Emily surely merit a photo.

Today, we take pictures of everything: happy moments, sad moments, meh moments. Those special occasions still get more attention from cameras, but even formal portraits no longer require formal clothing. Far more pictures are taken of the ordinary things in life — food, pets, house plants, clothing, home decor. We photograph everything.

None of this is bad in itself. The tagline for my other site is “celebrating beauty in creation,” and beauty can be found in many ordinary places or things, not merely within the realm of the sublime or the magnificent. Recently, I wrote a post about two contrasting fall photos: I preferred the artistic picture of a new leaf to the jumbled leaves on a sidewalk, but my readers pointed out that both pictures had a kind of beauty. Beauty can be found in a diamond or in a dandelion. Our constant access to cameras makes us more likely to find beauty in the small or mundane things, and that is good.

P1070190But, is my camera getting between me and my enjoyment of life? Is my incessant picture-taking keeping me from interacting with others because I’m so anxious to make sure this moment gets “recorded”? If it wasn’t photographed or documented on social media, did it happen? YES, it did, but sometimes I forget that. I have even found myself planning a hike to a scenic spot so that — it hurts to confess this — I’ll have a new cover photo for Facebook. I am glad to have my pictures later, but, whether or not I take a picture of a maple tree with leaves so brilliantly scarlet that they diminish everything else, the tree is still beautiful and still real.

This summer, as my daughter photographed the sunrise with her phone, I took a picture of her, with mine.

Granted, self-presentation is a key aspect of life in the online age. It’s not wrong to take pictures of breathtakingly beautiful sunsets or to record special performances like dance recitals, nor is it wrong to share those beautiful memories with others. But when I find myself panicking because I’m afraid I’ve left my camera at home — freaking out, in fact, as I did a few years ago on the way to my oldest son’s high school graduation — it is time to assess what is more important: enjoying the graduation, even if I have no pictures to treasure later, or making myself a nervous wreck because I’m not able to “capture” the moments.

IMG_2639

My middle child–shown here with my mother-in-law–seems to have survived the trauma of having a baby book with few photos.

The truth is, we cannot capture the moments. The moments will happen, and then they are gone. I do remember bygone days better if I have pictures of them, and my children love looking back at pictures of themselves when they were toddlers. How thankful I am that my mother somehow found the time to put those 60s and 70s photos in her scrapbooks! (One of the advantages of being an older child in my family is that my baby book has lots of pictures.) I didn’t do so well with pictures of my kids: my third child — beloved though he is — proved to be the straw that broke this camel’s back, and I have never caught up with my photo albums since his birth (he turns 19 today).

I’m thankful for the pictures and for the memories. But, as my mother reminded me during that tense drive to my son’s graduation, what matters is to be in the moment, to enjoy the people and the places around you face-to-face and not solely through the camera’s screen. By the way, I did have my camera with me, and I took lots of pictures at my son’s graduation. But I also made myself a little crazy, trying to get pictures of everything and everyone. I love to document things. As with everything else in my life, I need to find that elusive balance where cameras are concerned.


 

Afterword: If you have time, please read through some of the thoughtful comments that my readers have left here.  You can read more here about how digital cameras may be affecting our memories (thanks for the link, Michael).

 

Advertisements